Overview
On March 29, 2019, Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transportation (MLIT) promulgated its second phase of Heavy-Duty Vehicle fuel economy standards, which will become fully enforceable in model year (MY) 2025. Vehicles covered in the Phase 2 regulations include diesel trucks with a gross vehicle weight (GVW) >= 3.5 t, as well as buses with GVW >=3.5 t and those that carry 10 or more passengers.
Phase 2 regulations require on average a 13.4% efficiency improvement for trucks and a 14.3% improvement for buses compared to the Phase 1 regulations set for MY 2015.
Fuel economy
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Tourism (MLIT)
Current Standard
Applicability
Diesel trucks with a gross vehicle weight (GVW) >= 3.5 t, all diesel tractor trucks, diesel transit buses with GVW >= 6 t and diesel highway buses with GVW >= 3.5t.
History
Japan was the first jurisdiction in the world to set fuel efficiency performance regulations for commercial trucks and buses in 2005, which were estimated to be responsible for approximately one-quarter of all carbon dioxide emissions from motor vehicles in 2002. The standards were incorporated into Japan’s broad “Top-Runner” system of energy efficiency. Fuel economy improvement targets were disaggregated by vehicle type, class and weight using the best performing vehicles in fuel economy from 2002 as the baseline year. These ‘Phase 1’ regulations became fully enforceable in 2015.
As part of the Phase 1 fuel economy regulation, Japan also implemented a vehicle fuel efficiency certification program centered around a combination of engine dynamometer testing and vehicle simulation modeling. The effectiveness of the certification program is complemented by financial incentives such as progressive taxes that promote lighter vehicles. Vehicles that outperform the fuel economy and emissions standards may also be eligible for additional reductions in vehicle tax.
In April 2014, Japan adopted the fourth iteration of its Strategic Energy Plan. The Plan identifies the transportation sector as an important economic sector to target with energy conservation and efficiency improvement measures. The Phase 2 HDV fuel economy standards, along with Japan’s 2030 Passenger Vehicle fuel economy standards, reflect this energy conservation strategy.
As with the Phase 1 regulation, the Phase 2 fuel economy standards were determined using the ‘Top Runner’ method. Hybrids, electric vehicles, alternative fuel, and other advanced technology vehicles are excluded from the Top Runner system. However, the Phase 2 regulatory document states that MLIT would develop a measurement method for heavy-duty electric vehicles and would explore efficiency standards incorporating these and other types of advanced technology trucks and buses.
Technical Standards
Phase 2 standards apply to the same types and classes of diesel engine heavy-duty vehicles (GVW >= 3.5 t), including regular trucks, tractor trucks, transit buses and general (non-transit) buses. Like Phase 1, the updated standards are also applicable to non-type-approved diesel vehicles that are equipped with CO or other pollutant emissions control devices.
Japanese regulators tightened Phase 1 standards by raising the fuel economy targets. When the Phase 2 targets are fully met, the fleet average fuel economy is estimated to be:
For trucks, 7.63 km/L, a 13.4% improvement over the 2015 baseline at 6.72 km/L.
For buses, 6.52 km/L, a 14.3% improvement over the 2015 baseline at 5.71 km/L.
Table 1 summarizes the average Model Year 2015 baseline fuel consumption values (kilometers per liter of fuel consumed), 2025 requirements, and the percentage improvement between 2015 and 2025 for the major truck and bus categories. Average fuel efficiency values are based on weighting from 2014 sales data that the Japanese MLIT referred to in their regulatory document.
Vehicle type | Class | Fuel economy (km/L) | Improvement | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015 baseline | 2025 target | |||
Trucks | Tractor trucks | 2.84 | 2.94 | 3.7% |
Other trucks | 7.10 | 8.13 | 14.5% | |
Trucks average | 6.72 | 7.63 | 11.9% | |
Buses | Transit buses | 4.77 | 5.01 | 5.1% |
General buses | 6.07 | 7.18 | 18.3% | |
Buses average | 5.71 | 6.52 | 14.3% |
A detailed breakdown of standards for different heavy-duty vehicle types and classes is summarized in the following tables. Each manufacturer is required to meet the fuel efficiency target in all categories.
Category | GVW, t | FE Target, km/L |
---|---|---|
1 | 6 < GVW ≤ 8 | 7.15 |
2 | 8 < GVW ≤ 10 | 6.30 |
3 | 10 < GVW ≤ 12 | 5.80 |
4 | 12 < GVW ≤ 14 | 5.27 |
5 | 14 < GVW | 4.52 |
Category | GVW, t | FE Target, km/L |
---|---|---|
1 | 3.5 < GVW ≤ 6 | 9.54 |
2 | 6 < GVW ≤ 8 | 7.73 |
3 | 8 < GVW ≤ 10 | 6.37 |
4 | 10 < GVW ≤ 12 | 6.06 |
5 | 12 < GVW ≤ 14 | 5.29 |
6 | 14 < GVW ≤ 16 | 5.28 |
7 | 16 < GVW | 5.14 |
Category | GVW, t | Max Load (L), t | FE Target, km/L |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.5 < GVW ≤ 7.5 | L ≤ 1.5 | 13.45 |
2 | 1.5 < L ≤ 2 | 11.93 | |
3 | 2 < L ≤ 3 | 10.59 | |
4 | 3 < L | 9.91 | |
5 | 7.5 < GVW ≤ 8 | 8.39 | |
6 | 8 < GVW ≤ 10 | 7.46 | |
7 | 10 < GVW ≤ 12 | 7.44 | |
8 | 12 < GVW ≤ 14 | 6.42 | |
9 | 14 < GVW ≤ 16 | 5.89 | |
10 | 16 < GVW ≤ 20 | 4.88 | |
11 | 20 < GVW | 4.42 |
Category | GVW, t | FE Target, km/L |
---|---|---|
1 | GVW ≤ 20 | 3.11 |
2 | GVW > 20 | 2.32 |
Testing
The Phase 2 standards retain the existing test cycles for heavy-duty vehicles but modify some of the weighting and load factor assumptions to better reflect real-world driving conditions. The test cycles include a JE05 test for urban driving simulation and an interurban transient test. Compliance is determined by aggregating the fuel economies measured under these test cycles, based on weighting factors that reflect assumptions about the operating environments and use cases of different classes of vehicles. The Phase 2 standards include new percentage weights for interurban driving conditions and variable load factors (cargo mass and passengers) that better reflect real-world driving conditions. Table 6 summarizes changes to these two parameters for different vehicle classes and types.
Vehicle Type | Vehicle Class | GVW, t | Interurban % weights | Load factor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trucks | Tractors | 45 | 50 | |
Non-tractors | 3.5 ≤ GVW<7.5 | 15 | 45 | |
7.5<GVW ≤ 8 | 35 | 50 | ||
8<GVW ≤ 20 | 40 | 50 | ||
20<GVW ≤ 25 | 55 | 55 | ||
Buses | Transit buses | 6<GVW | 0 | 35 |
General buses | 3.5<GVW ≤ 10 | 15 | 60 | |
10<GVW ≤ 14 | 45 | 65 | ||
14<GVW | 55 | 65 |
The Phase 2 standards include several other modifications to certification protocols and simulation models:
- Additional test points to the steady-state engine fuel map: increased from the prior 31 points (6 RPM x 5 torque points plus one idle) to 51 points (10 RPM x 5 torque points plus one idle point);
- Incorporated confirmed data for aerodynamic and rolling resistance into the simulation;
- Changed the manual transmission shifting algorithm by making minor adjustments to engine rotation speeds;
- For Automated Manual Transmission (AMT) vehicles, gear positions are calculated second-by-second;
- Introduced a new function to estimate inertial mass corresponding to the drive system to be used to estimate air resistance from the coast down test;
- Introduced a 3% correction factor for the urban driving mode to capture the effects of transient engine operation.
Compliance
Similar to Phase 1, compliance with the Phase 2 standards is measured by reference to the individual fuel economy targets for each vehicle class, gross vehicle weight, and for lighter trucks, rated cargo load. Japan had introduced a cross-category crediting system that allowed transfer of half the emissions reductions from vehicles that overachieve the fuel economy targets to vehicles that fail to achieve the targets. This credit system will be kept under the Phase 2 standards.
Links
Regulatory Documents
2025 Standards, set in 2019
2015 Standards, set in 2005
Notes
ICCT policy update on Japan’s Phase 2 heavy-duty fuel economy standards, January 2019